Thursday, April 25, 2013

'Vanilla Ice Goes Amish,' 'Bronson Pinchot Saves America' and more ...

vanilla-ice-goes-amish.jpgDIY, the do-it-yourself network that features a myriad of home improvement shows, has announced four new series featuring celebrities who enjoy renovating and restoring homes.

"Vanilla Ice Goes Amish" will show the former early-90s rapper learning about home building from skilled Amish craftsmen. There will be no power tools and no music, just sweat and hard work as Vanilla Ice builds a barn on the largest Amish settlement in the U.S. in Holmes County, Ohio.

Rev. Run, of hip-hop group Run DMC, will be renovating his 9000-square foot home for "The Rev. Run Project." The rapper will give his mansion a facelift, including adding an indoor pool with the help of his wife, Justine, and their three children.

Bronson Pinchot is getting a spinoff from "The Bronson Pinchot Project" in "Bronson Pinchot Saves America," where the former "Perfect Strangers" star and his sidekick Mikey travel the U.S. looking for artifacts that they can save from demolition.

Finally, Daryl Hall, of musical duo Hall & Oates, will debut "The Daryl Hall Project," where he restores a historical Connecticut farmhouse built by a widowed sea captain. He'll work hard to marry historical accuracy with modern touches and smalltown regulations.

Are you excited to see some of your favorite celebs' new home improvement shows?

Photo/Video credit: Getty Images

Source: http://blog.zap2it.com/frominsidethebox/2013/04/vanilla-ice-goes-amish-bronson-pinchot-saves-america-and-more-renovation-projects-announced-on-diy.html

maria menounos proposition 8 ricky martin larry bird chauncey billups caucus results exton

Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR


The Fujifilm FinePix HS50EXR ($549.95 list) is a big camera with an impressive zoom lens. Its styled like a D-SLR, complete with manual control over the zoom, and covers a staggering 24-1,000mm range. Additional features like a sharp EVF, vari-angle rear display, and a very sensible control layout make the 16-megapixel shooter an appealing choice for photographers in search of a camera that can capture wide landscapes and distant objects. The HS50EXR does well at lower ISO settings, but its images suffer when shooting at higher sensitivities. It's a good camera, but can't match Fuji's top-end superzoom, the X-S1, which features a similar manual zoom lens, or our Editors' Choice, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200, which manages to maintain a wide f/2.8 aperture throughout its 24x zoom range.

Design and Features
A lot like a small SLR, the HS50EXR has a deep handgrip, an eye-level electronic viewfinder, and a big lens with manual focus adjustment. Unlike an SLR you can't change the lens, and you won't benefit from a huge image sensor. The HS50EXR uses a 1/2-inch sensor, which is a little larger than the 1/2.3-inch design used in most compact and long zoom cameras, but not quite as big as the 1/1.7-inch type used in high-end compacts like the Canon PowerShot G15 or the big 2/3-inch sensor used in Fuji's own X-S1 superzoom.

The HS50EXR measures 4 by 5.3 by 5.7 inches and weighs 1.8 pounds. It's a bit bigger than the FZ200 (3.5 by 4.9 by 4.3 inches, 1.3 pounds), which keeps its size and weight under control thanks to a shorter zoom ratio. The HS50EXR lens covers a 24-1,000mm (35mm equivalent zoom range) and features? a variable aperture that opens up to f/2.8 on the wide end, but dwindles to f/5.6 as you zoom in. The FZ200's lens is only a 24x design (24-600mm), but it maintains f/2.8 throughout. The HS50EXR closes down to f/5.6, which captures only 25 percent as much light as f/2.8, at focal lengths longer than 300mm. The lens is stabilized, and I was able to get a sharp, handheld shot at maximum zoom with a shutter speed of 1/60-second?which is about four f-stops of effectiveness.

Because of the SLR-like design, there's plenty of real estate for control buttons and dials. On the top of the handgrip, to the right of the pop-up flash, you'll find the power switch and shutter, the mode dial, and a control wheel. Buttons to activate continuous drive shooting and to control EV compensation for quick image brightness adjustments are also here. The rear panel holds buttons to activate exposure lock, toggle macro focusing, control the flash, set the self-timer, and record movies. There's also a Q button, which is located to the left of the eyepiece, that brings up a software menu that allows you to quickly adjust common shooting settings. From that menu you can adjust the ISO, white balance, video resolution, still image quality, metering pattern, focus area, and activate Fuji's film simulation settings. These settings tune the JPG output to match the look of classic film stocks, including Velvia, Provia, and Astia.

The 3-inch LCD is a hinged vari-angle design. It can sit flat against the back of the camera, but also swings out and rotates so you can view it from above, below, or with the camera facing you. It packs an impressive 920k-dot resolution, so you can review images to confirm critical focus right from the camera. There's also an eye-level LCD viewfinder, which is quite handy when shooting at longer focal lengths as shooting at eye-level makes it easier to hold the camera steady. The EVF is about a quarter-inch in size, but packs 920k dots into that space. The EVF in the Panasonic FZ200 is a bit sharper and crisper; it packs 1,312k dots into its frame.

If you're a fan of manual focus, the HS50EXR has one feature that will jump out?Peaking. When you switch the camera into manual focus mode, Peaking activates to highlight in-focus areas in white. It works best on edges that show contrast. There's also a focus aid that acts a bit like a bar graph?a white line lengthens as you get closer to locking proper focus, eventually lining up with a yellow dot to let you know that you're ready to take the shot. The autofocus system generally does a good job, but it's good to know that you'll have some help achieving accurate focus on your own if needed.

Performance and ConclusionsFujifilm FinePix HS50EXR : Benchmark Tests
The HS50EXR starts and grabs a shot in about 1.5 seconds. Its shutter lag is an acceptable 0.2-second, and it can fire off a burst of 7 JPG photos at just under 8 frames per second. If you opt to shoot Raw or Raw+JPG the speed and number of shots you can get in a burst are reduced; you'll be limited to a maximum of 5 shots at 5.7 frames per second. The Panasonic FZ200 does a better job; it starts and shoots in 1.3 seconds, can grab a 12-shot burst in just over a second, and its shutter lag is a minimal 0.1-second.

I used Imatest to check the sharpness of images captured by the HS50EXR's lens. It managed 2,132 lines per picture height on the test, better than the 1,800 lines required for a sharp photo. The Fujifilm X-S1 didn't do as well, only scoring 1,685 lines on the same test. At its maximum zoom the images appear to be a bit softer, but space in our studio doesn't allow us get a resolution score at that focal length, but shots of our studio test scene captured at the 1,000mm focal equivalent show that the HS50EXR holds up when zoomed all the way in.

Imatest also checks photos for noise, which can make a photo appear grainy and sap detail from shots. Noise increases along with ISO, which is a numerical representation of a camera's sensitivity to light. The HS50EXR keeps noise below 1.5 percent through ISO 800, but fine details are erased by noise reduction at this setting. Image quality isn't that much better at ISO 400, but it's quite good at ISO 200 and 100. These low settings will be used on bright days, but if you're shooting in dimmer conditions or trying to get a fast shutter speed when zoomed in, you'll likely have to shoot at a higher ISO. The Fujifilm X-S1, which features a larger 2/3-inch image sensor, does a much better job at higher ISO settings. It keeps noise below 1.5 percent through ISO 1600, and delivers images with about as much detail at that setting as the HS50EXR captures at ISO 400.

Video is recorded at 1080p60 or 720p60 quality in QuickTime format. The camera refocuses with ease and motion is quite smooth. The lens is a manual zoom design, so the sound of it moving being captured on the recording is largely dependent on how careful you are in doing so. I didn't find it to be noticeable on the soundtrack, but you can connect an external microphone if you're using the camera for more serious video work. The microphone port is a 2.5mm design, smaller than the more common 3.5mm, so you'll have to get an adapter in order to use a standard microphone. A dedicated charger is included, so you won't have to charge the battery inside the camera as you do with other recent models. In addition to the mic input there is a mini HDMI output and a proprietary USB port. As with most cameras, SD, SDHC, and SDXC memory cards are supported.

The HS50EXR delivers an impressive 42x zoom range in a form factor that's about the same size as a D-SLR with a 3x zoom lens attached. Its EVF is quite sharp and its optical stabilization system is effective. It doesn't do as well at higher ISO settings as the more expensive Fujifilm X-S1, and its zoom lens isn't as fast or sharp at the telephoto end as our Editors' Choice Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. We still think that the FZ200 is the superzoom to get?its range isn't quite as long, but it makes up for it with a lens that never drops below f/2.8?capturing four times the light at its maximum zoom as the HS50EXR is capable of at the same focal length. If you prefer a camera with a manual zoom lens, save your pennies and splurge for the Fujifilm X-S1; it debuted at $800, but is currently selling for less.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ziffdavis/pcmag/~3/htIa_-ebWlA/0,2817,2417955,00.asp

Alabama Shakes PlayStation 4 michael jordan Safe Haven Robbie Rogers WWE Rita Ora

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

Miley Cyrus Wedding: Still An Eventual Go, Source Claims

Source: http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2013/04/miley-cyrus-wedding-still-an-eventual-go-source-claims/

empire state building Hurricane prince harry hunger games Joey Kovar Expendables 2 Pussy Riot

92% Jurassic Park: An IMAX 3D Experience

All Critics (95) | Top Critics (24) | Fresh (96) | Rotten (8) | DVD (39)

The enthralling man-vs.-nature parable based on the late Michael Crichton's best-selling novel hasn't aged one bit.

The 3-D process adds not just dimension but depth - a technological extension of cinematographer Gregg Toland's deep-focus innovations in The Grapes of Wrath and Citizen Kane. The change in perspective creates greater intensity.

I'm a fan of this movie. It is thrilling, and the 3-D treatment is a nice enhancement.

This movie doesn't just stand the test of time, it transcends it.

"Jurassic Park" remains an absolute thrill from a Spielberg in top form: Funny, scary, fast-moving and full of just-right details.

"Jurassic Park" was impressive in 1993. Twenty years later, it's flawless.

Steven Spielbeg's 1993 tale of an island plagued dinosaurs running amok holds up surprisingly well in the special effects category.

The film is a classic and the chance to see it on the big screen again (or for the first time) should not be missed

Sentiment is explained by science as the family impulse that motivates so many Steven Spielberg stories is revealed to be an evolutionary imperative in this near-perfect action-adventure.

[Looks] better not only than effects-driven movies of the same period, but better, frankly, than half of what gets released nowadays.

Kids who love dinosaurs will love it. And who doesn't?

confirms both Spielberg's mastery of cinematic thrills and the comparatively empty bombast of today's summer tentpole movies, even the better ones.

Jurassic Park shows us a director in transition, and the film captures his transformation in its own kind of cinematic amber.

[The] 3D [conversion] provides the definitive version of this classic film. Jurassic Park has been transformed with with artistry, nuance and sophistication, and it's an absolute must-see during this brief run.

The 3D effects had me nearly jumping out of my seat. Some say Hollywood is converting too many old films to 3D. But, "Jurassic Park" was the perfect choice. There's nothing more fun than sharing a seat with a snapping dinosaur.

Spielberg treats us as he does his characters, leading us into a strange land and expecting us to make it out with all our faculties intact; it's a tall order, given the heart-stopping, bloodcurdling, limbs-numbing excitement packed into the second hour.

It is as if time has passed the movie by. "Jurassic Park" remains solid entertainment, but the awe and wonder have faded.

The thrill of seeing live dinosaurs on screen is not as acute today as it was 20 years ago admittedly, but there is still some 3D awe left in the creations that roared 65 billion years ago...

The 3D isn't pushed on the audience, but it does reveal the amount of depth that Spielberg actually put into the film 20 years ago.

While it's not the most profound of Spielberg's works or the most entertaining from a popcorn perspective, it's one of the most technically flawless movies he's ever produced.

Jurassic Park 3D is like being reunited with an old friend; an old friend that wants to eat you and maul you to death, but still. A classic is reborn in glorious IMAX with a vibrantly stunning use of 3D.

If releasing the film in 3-D is the only way to get it back in theaters, then the gimmick is an acceptable addition. The 3-D is good. But when a movie is this near flawless, nothing is needed to make it better.

The 3D conversion ruins everything, like the comet that killed the dinosaurs, making Jurassic Park the rare amusement I'd prefer to revisit at home.

A beast of a movie is gifted a superfluous-but-superb rouging of the cheeks, offering fanatics something new to study while newcomers will be ruined for any future television airings.

The tasteful Jurassic Park 3D conversion injects new wonder and excitement into one of the most captivating adventure movies ever made.

Source: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/jurassic_park_an_imax_3d_experience_1993/

whitney houston Salwa Amin Grammys 2013 2013 Grammy Winners abraham lincoln Chris Dorner 1800 Flowers

Monday, April 8, 2013

Afghan government says airstrike kills 11 children

The lifeless bodies of Afghan children lay on the ground before their funeral ceremony, after a NATO airstrike killed several Afghan civilians, including ten children during a fierce gun battle with Taliban militants in Shultan, Shigal district, Kunar, eastern Afghanistan, Sunday, April 7, 2013. The U.S.-led coalition confirms that airstrikes were called in by international forces during the Afghan-led operation in a remote area of Kunar province near the Pakistan border. (AP Photo/Naimatullah Karyab)

The lifeless bodies of Afghan children lay on the ground before their funeral ceremony, after a NATO airstrike killed several Afghan civilians, including ten children during a fierce gun battle with Taliban militants in Shultan, Shigal district, Kunar, eastern Afghanistan, Sunday, April 7, 2013. The U.S.-led coalition confirms that airstrikes were called in by international forces during the Afghan-led operation in a remote area of Kunar province near the Pakistan border. (AP Photo/Naimatullah Karyab)

Former Taliban militants stand in line, hand-cuffed after turning in their weapons during a ceremony with the Afghan government in Herat, Afghanistan, Sunday, April 7, 2013. About six former Taliban militants from Herat province handed over their weapons as part of a peace-reconciliation program. (AP Photo/Hoshang Hashimi)

(AP) ? A fierce battle between U.S.-backed Afghan forces and Taliban militants in a remote corner of eastern Afghanistan left nearly 20 people dead, including 11 Afghan children killed in an airstrike and an American civilian adviser, officials said Sunday.

The fighting along a main infiltration route from Pakistan on Saturday was indicative of a surge in hostilities as Afghanistan's spring fighting season gets underway. This year's will be closely watched because Afghan forces are having to contend with less support from the international military coalition, making it a test case of their ability to take on the country's resilient insurgency.

The U.S.-led coalition confirmed that it launched airstrikes in Kunar province where the deaths occurred, stressing that they were requested by international forces. The coalition said it was assessing the incident, but could not confirm that civilians were killed.

The battle unfolded on Saturday, the same day that a total of six Americans, including three U.S. soldiers, died in violent attacks. In addition to the U.S. adviser killed during the operation in the east, two others ? a female foreign service officer with the U.S. State Department and an employee with the U.S. Defense Department ? died in a suicide bombing in southern Zabul province during a trip to donate books to Afghan students.

The deaths capped one of the bloodiest weeks of the nearly 12-year-old war. On Wednesday, insurgents ambushed a courthouse in the relatively safe west, killing more than 46 people.

The death of Afghan civilians caught in the crossfire has been a major point of contention between international forces and the Afghan government. Earlier this year, Afghan President Hamid Karzai banned his troops from requesting coalition airstrikes.

In the latest incident, Associated Press photos showed villagers gathered for the funerals of the children whose bodies were swaddled in blankets. A garland of flowers adorned the head of a dead baby.

Afghan officials said the airstrike occurred after a joint U.S.-Afghan force faced hours of heavy gunfire from militants. The joint force was conducting an operation targeting a senior Taliban leader that began around midnight Friday in the Shultan area of Kunar's Shigal district, according to tribal elder Gul Pasha, who also is the chief of the local council.

The remote area is one of the main points of entry for Taliban and other insurgents trying to move across the mountainous border from neighboring Pakistan, where they enjoy refuge in the lawless northwestern area.

"In the morning after sunrise, planes appeared in the sky and airstrikes started," Pasha said in a telephone interview, adding that the fighting didn't end until the evening.

"I don't think that they knew that all these children and women were in the house because they were under attack from the house and they were shooting at the house," he said.

There were slightly differing accounts of the death toll.

Pasha said the main Taliban suspect was in the house that was hit and was killed along with a woman and the children, ages 1 to 12, who were members of the suspect's family.

Provincial government spokesman Wasifullah Wasify said 10 children and one woman were killed and five women, who also were in the house, were wounded.

Karzai's office later said 11 people were killed ? all of them children ? and six women were wounded.

"While the president strongly condemns the Taliban act of using people and their houses as shields, he also strongly condemns any operation on populated areas that results in civilian casualties," his office said in a statement.

An airstrike in the same district in Kunar that killed 10 civilians in mid-February prompted Karzai to ban his forces from requesting airstrikes.

Afghanistan's Interior Ministry said six Taliban militants were killed in the operation in Sano Dara Sheltan village, including two senior commanders identified as Ali Khan and Gul Raof, the main planner and organizer of attacks in the area.

The U.S.-led coalition said it provided fire support from the air, killing several insurgents.

"The air support was called in by coalition forces, not Afghan security forces, and was used to engage insurgent forces in areas away from structures, according to our reporting," coalition spokesman Maj. Adam Wojack said in a statement.

He said the coalition takes all reports of civilian casualties seriously, and was currently assessing the incident.

Afghan forces have been increasingly taking the lead in combat operations as international forces move to complete their withdrawal by the end of 2014. But U.S. and other foreign troops still face dangers as they try to clear areas of insurgents and prepare the Afghans to take control.

Gen. Martin Dempsey, the top U.S. military officer, told the AP in an interview on Sunday in Afghanistan that he was cautiously optimistic about the final stage of handing off security responsibility to Afghan forces.

Asked if he thought that some parts of Afghanistan will be contested by the Taliban in 2015, Dempsey replied, "Yes, of course there will be. And if we were having this conversation 10 years from now, I suspect there would (still) be contested areas because the history of Afghanistan suggests that there will always be contested areas."

There are about 100,000 international troops currently in Afghanistan, including 66,000 from the United States. The U.S. troop total is scheduled to drop to about 32,000 by early next year. The bulk of the decline is to occur after fighting winds down this winter.

___

AP writers Rahim Faiez in Kabul, Rahmat Gul in Jalalabad and Robert Burns at Bagram Air Field contributed.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/cae69a7523db45408eeb2b3a98c0c9c5/Article_2013-04-07-Afghanistan/id-952610478c0c4466b01732d743ff0709

ufc on fox 2 weigh ins convulsions